A people-first think tank and engagement lab

Always With Democracy

A people-first think tank and

engagement lab

Research Ethics

These principles are adapted from the Social Research Associations guidance on Research Ethics.


1. Informed Consent


Informed consent means that individuals participate in research only when they:

  • Understand the purpose of the research

  • Understand what participation involves

  • Freely and voluntarily agree to take part

Participation must always be voluntary and free from pressure or coercion. Consent is treated as an ongoing process, not a one-off decision. Participants must be aware that they can withdraw at any time, without giving a reason and without penalty.


1.1 Information Provided to Participants


Participants will be given clear, accessible information covering:

  • Who is conducting the research

  • Who is funding it

  • The purpose of the study

  • How the data will be used and by whom

  • What participation involves (e.g., interview length, recording, filming, questionnaires)

  • Who will have access to personal data

  • Any reasonably foreseeable risks

  • Any other relevant information necessary to support informed decision-making

Information will be presented in a format appropriate to participants needs, taking into account factors like literacy levels and English language proficiency.


1.2 Addressing Power Imbalances


Where researchers may be perceived as holding authority (e.g., representing government or institutions), steps will be taken to:

  • Clearly emphasise the voluntary nature of participation

  • Reinforce participants right to decline or withdraw

  • Minimise perceived pressure to participate


1.3 Ongoing Consent in Practice


Researchers will:

  • Remain attentive to verbal and non-verbal cues of discomfort

  • Offer participants the option to skip questions or take breaks

  • Check privately with individuals in group settings if discomfort is observed

  • Confirm at the end of interviews that participants are comfortable with the material discussed being used

2. Confidentiality and Anonymity


2.1 Protection of Personal Data

Researchers will protect participants identities by removing direct identifiers such as:

  • Name

  • Date of birth

  • Address

Indirect identifiers (e.g., job title, employer, location, unique characteristics) will also be considered carefully to prevent deductive disclosure.


2.2 Organisational and Community Confidentiality


Confidentiality considerations extend to organisations and communities that may be identifiable through contextual information such as size, sector, or location.


2.3 Data Collection Safeguards

To prevent confidentiality breaches:

  • Clear confidentiality ground rules will be set in focus groups

  • Intrusive questions will be avoided unless essential

  • Participants right not to answer questions will be respected

2.4 Reporting and Dissemination

When reporting findings, confidentiality may be protected through:

  • Omitting identifiable details

  • Changing key characteristics

  • Using anonymised or pseudonymised identifiers


3. Avoiding Harm


Researchers have an ethical responsibility to anticipate, minimise and respond to potential harm throughout the research lifecycle.


While not all risks can be predicted, careful planning and ongoing vigilance will reduce the likelihood and impact of harm.


3.1 Mitigating against physical harm

The safety of research locations will be assessed to minimise physical risk to participants and researchers.


3.2 Mitigating against emotional distress

Researchers will:

  • Avoid unnecessarily focusing on distressing topics

  • Monitor verbal and non-verbal signs of discomfort

  • Respond sensitively and appropriately

  • Pause or redirect interviews if required

Participants will be informed of potential emotional risks as part of informed consent.


3.3 Harm to Wider Groups


Research findings may unintentionally portray particular groups negatively or reinforce stereotypes. Researchers will:

  • Avoid suppressing findings

  • Report results responsibly and without judgemental language

  • Consider broader social implications when disseminating findings


4. Research Integrity & Questionable Practices


All research must be conducted and reported with honesty, transparency and professional competence.


4.1 Fabrication


Fabrication refers to the invention of data or research activities that did not occur. This includes:

  • Reporting research that was not conducted

  • Inventing participants or responses

  • Adding fictitious data to strengthen findings


Fabrication is strictly prohibited.


4.2 Falsification


Falsification involves altering or omitting data to misrepresent results, including:

  • Modifying data to change outcomes

  • Misrepresenting statistical analysis

  • Misstating methods used

Researchers must ensure findings are reported accurately and without distortion.


4.3 Plagiarism


Plagiarism is the use of another persons ideas, words or findings without proper acknowledgement. This includes:

  • Direct copying without citation

  • Paraphrasing without credit


All sources must be appropriately acknowledged.


4.4 Acknowledging Methodological Limitations


Researchers must clearly state the strengths and limitations of their methods.

Overclaiming validity, accuracy or generalisability whether in qualitative or quantitative research undermines integrity. Examples include:

  • Making population-level claims from non-representative samples

  • Selectively using qualitative quotes without contextual information

  • Failing to explain sampling limitations

Researchers are expected to:

  • Understand the strengths and weaknesses of the methods they use

  • Ensure third-party representations of their work do not mislead

A people-first think tank and

engagement lab